He survives after receiving 40 shot in the head and being buried alive until the snout

The discovery of a dog had been buried alive until the muzzle after receiving 40 shot in the head It generated the alert in Malta to carry out a reform of its animal welfare laws. The animal, a question of races cross without defining female, they have called the Star, It was found near the town of Birzebbuga by animal welfare officers investigating another unrelated case.

After hearing moans from underneath a wooden board with a trunk placed on the upper part of the same, to make it more heavy, agents were discovered the painful spectacle. When Star was taken from Earth discovered that their four limbs had been tied and that He had received several impacts of pellets, of which doctors removed his instead of 40 his skull during surgery emergency at the hospital in Ta ' Qali.

Star is currently alive and recovering while their continuous aggressor released. The social impact of these events has been highlighted through several initiatives as pages Facebook expressing their support in any case has come to add 7000 followers and more than 1000 requests on line to catch the perpetrator and generate funds to pay the vet bills.

Source: dailymail.co.UK

The ' poly’ not be wroth with the pequinés

Sentenced to 20 days of fine agent who killed a dog of a shot in the head

Amine NASSER Granada

The agent during the trial. EFE

To the 4 the evening of the 12 in May of 2009, Police Local Jacinto M. D., When was in service in the police vehicle, sighted “a Pekinese dog, about four kilograms of weight without purity of breed or pedigree”, lying on the floor and sleeping near the gate to the House of a neighbor, in the town of Puebla de Don Fadrique (Granada). From the same vehicle, with a “unspecified firearm”, the agent shot to the head of the dog , “causing death” and then pulled the animal in a container trash. These are the facts of the judgment of the criminal court number 3 of Granada, condemns the police as the author of a lack of damage to the penalty of 20 fine days, with a daily quota of 10 EUR, as well as to compensate with 225 euros to the owner of the can and to pay half of the costs involved, but it acquits the crime of animal abuse that accused you.

The dog in question is called Coke. It was nine months old and the custom of escape of the farmhouse he lived to chase by the people and lie down to sleep anywhere. The judgment considered fully proven that the police killed the Pekingese's accurate shot, but has not been able to try tell the agent “I'm going after you” When he saw the dog sleeping. In the resolution, the owner of the criminal court number 3 of Granada, Antonio Aguilera Morales, considers that the actions of the agent “It is contrary to all sensitivity and respect for animals”, but is not disputed that the dog suffer or that cruelty had used”.

The agent has been acquitted of the crime of domestic animal abuse, given that the “death of the can was immediate consequence of having been shot in the head”, without that “He deliberately increased the suffering of the animal”.

The judgment, However, considers that “the accused killed the animal in an unjustified manner that he could have used a less violent means for the capture of the animal and not to resort to killing him or, in the event of failure to” could “make the necessary steps to give notice to the Kennel”.

It is the first time in Spain that a local agent is sentenced as the perpetrator of a lack for killing a dog. At the trial, that was seen to ruling last February, the accused confessed that he shot the dog in the head and assured that the animal “was a danger”.

During the oral hearing, the Prosecutor amended its provisional conclusions and described the facts lack of damage comouna, instead of the crime of animal abuse that had initially considered. The private prosecution, exercised by the protective Association of animals 'The refuge‘, It had requested a sentence of one year's imprisonment for the crime of animal abuse and another for an offence of threats.

Source: http://www.Publico.es

One of every three abandoned animals is a puppy

I talked about it to the problem months ago involved the abandonment of pets, not only by what this vandalism Act is already in itself, but because in addition in many cases demonstrated that it is put at stake the lives of other people.

I was referring to a study that had made theDirectorate-General for traffic new window (DGT) in which they told us that the invasion of animals on the road caused more than 12.000 traffic accidents in 2008 on Spanish roads, of those who 2.899 they were caused by abandoned dogs, it caused 168 victims (a dead man, 26 serious injuries and mild 141heridos).

Starting with these shocking data, tell you also that the 33% the animals abandoned in Spain each year are from unwanted litters of puppies, as he has told us the National Association for the defence of animals (ANDA).

And although the measure proposed sounds like something lasts, Perhaps it can be a path more than help to resolve the problem. To combat this problem, the Association commitment to subsidize the sterilizations. "It ensures that Spain would squander billions Euros with its mistaken policy of abandoned animals collection".

According to ANDA, the crisis "is is noting also in the field of animal protection", "Although not so much on the increase in the number of animals abandoned in the decrease of aid".

According to, many municipalities have decided to deal with the collection of animals abandoned to private enterprises "normally choose to slaughter the animals within the time limits established by law", "before that can be adopted".

ANDA considered that administrations "them it would much more profitable to subsidize the sterilization of pets". With this, avoidance of unwanted litters, "that one of every three retirements in Spain is a puppy".

"While we do not act in this sense", "Spain will be presenting one of the highest figures for abandonment of pets in Europe and we will have to continue funding the collection and sacrifice of thousands of animals in a vicious circle without end".

Source: http://www.blogdemedioambiente.com

The refuge requests 1 year and 6 months in jail for veterinarians, Director and owner Kennel Puerto Real

El Refugio
Dead dogs

Soon will be held in Cadiz the first trial against a kennel for animal abuse at Spain and will be judged the owner, the Director and two veterinarians

The refuge, in its notice of allegations, requested to declare the vets, the Director and the owner of the Kennel, as defendants, as well as three players of the team of the Seprona de Cádiz, an agent of the local police in the city of Port Royal, Thirteen witnesses and four veterinarians as expert witnesses.

La audiencia provincial de Cádiz explica que tanto el dueño como la directora de la perrera de Puerto Real presuntamente conocían el uso de Mioflex y supuestamente daban instrucciones de su uso a los veterinarios con el objetivo de ahorrar costes.

They are cited to testify as witnesses the Town Hall of Cádiz health delegates, Puerto Real and San Fernando who supposedly knew the irregularities.

The refuge denounced the facts and is personado as a charge in the Court No. 2 Puerto real.

Supposedly collected animals were sacrificed with Mioflex, a paralyzing muscle that was injected indiscriminately causing to dogs and cats collected a slow and agonising death from asphyxia.

In his indictment says El Refugio:

Qualification of the facts.

The facts that allegedly happened in the Kennel of Puerto Real, they are constitutive of the following offences:

1.- Fact 1: An offence of abuse continued to pet article 337, in relation to articles 74.1 and 70.1. 1 of the criminal code (existing wording at the time of the facts).

2.- Fact 2: A lack of continued abuse to domestic animal of the article 632.2 and 74.1 Penal Code.

3.- Fact 3: A lack of continued abuse to domestic animal of the article 632.2 and 74.1 Penal Code.

4.- Fact 4: A crime of false denunciation of the article 457 under the article 456 of the criminal code.

Alleged authorship

.- E. C. R. (Former veterinarian) It is supposedly responsible for concept of copyright offences: 1, 2 and 3.

.- R. A. P. B. (regular veterinarian) It is supposedly responsible for concept of copyright offences: 1, 2, 3 and 4.

.- M. A. B., Director, It is supposedly responsible as author of the crime: 1, 2 and 3.

.- P. G. D., owner, It is supposedly responsible for concept of copyright offences: 1, 2 and 3.

Penalty

For E. C. R. (Former veterinarian):

to) A penalty of one year and six months in prison for the continuing crime number 1, accessory of disqualification for the right of passive suffrage and disqualification from the exercise of profession, craft or trade that has relationship with the animal for a period of four years and six months.

b) A sentence of 60 days of fine by the continued lack number 2, with daily fee of 50,00€ with residual personal liability in case of default.

c) A sentence of 60 days of fine by the continued lack number 3, with daily fee of 50,00€ with residual personal liability in case of default.

For R. A. P. B. (Regular veterinarian):

to) A penalty of one year and six months in prison for the continuing crime number 1, accessory of disqualification for the right of passive suffrage and disqualification from the exercise of profession, craft or trade that has relationship with the animal for a period of four years and six months.

b) A sentence of 60 days of fine by the continued lack number 2, with daily fee of 50,00€ with residual personal liability in case of default.

c) A sentence of 60 days of fine by the continued lack number 3, with daily fee of 50,00€ with residual personal liability in case of default.

(d)) A sentence of twelve months of fine for the offence number 4, with daily fee of 50,00€ with residual personal liability in case of default

For M. A. N. (Director):

to) A penalty of one year and six months in prison for the continuing crime number 1, accessory of disqualification for the right of passive suffrage and disqualification from the exercise of profession, craft or trade that has relationship with the animal for a period of four years and six months.

b) A sentence of 60 days of fine by the continued lack number 2, with daily fee of 30,00€ with residual personal liability in case of default.

c) A sentence of 60 days of fine by the continued lack number 3, with daily fee of 50,00€ with residual personal liability in case of default.

For P. G. D.(Owner):

to) A penalty of one year and six months in prison for the continuing crime number 1, accessory of disqualification for the right of passive suffrage and disqualification from the exercise of profession, craft or trade that has relationship with the animal for a period of four years and six months.

b) A sentence of 60 days of fine by the continued lack number 2, with daily fee of € 75,00 with residual personal liability in case of default.

c) A sentence of 60 days of fine by the continued lack number 3, with daily fee of € 75,00 with residual personal liability in case of default.

For all defendants imposition of costs, express condemnation to pay the costs of this accusation.

"It will be the first trial against the perpetrators of a Kennel Spain". "It is gratifying to know that justice works, and that veterinarians, the Director and the owner of the Kennel of Puerto Real will face trial for an alleged crime of abuse of animals". Indicated Nacho Paunero, President of the refuge.

The refuge denounced illegal facts alleged before the Seprona the 15 in June of the year 2007 initiating criminal proceedings in the Court No. 2 Puerto real, until today has five volumes with nearly of 2500 folios.

The protectionist organization is specified as a charge in the first criminal proceedings against a kennel in Spain. The alleged criminal who are charged are: alleged offences of false documents and false reporting, as well as crime of mistreatment of animals.

The Kennel of Puerto Real gathered thousands of dogs and cats, annually, several municipalities in the province of Cádiz. Supposedly collected animals were sacrificed with a paralyzing muscle that was injected indiscriminately causing a slow and agonising death from asphyxia in most of the time could take several minutes to dogs and cats collected, during which the dog or cat is absolutely aware until he died stifled because it affects the respiratory muscles.

The horror in the Kennel of Puerto Real, He was allegedly going on for years. The Kennel is a company listed as society limited in the register of societies and whose sole administrator and owner is P. G. D., There is the fact that the name of this society is that of Protector Association of animals S. L. According to the refuge in many cases, This type of companies that collect animals only seek to make money, they appear to protect animals, but in any case they do.

Source: http://www.elrefugio.org

Looking for a killer dog that hangs the cruel abuse videos on the Internet

Seprona investigates who is behind the ' elephant’

The case has mobilized even to the Group of ' Cyber’ Annonymous

Human cruelty has no boundaries and boasts a killer of dogs in a video posted on the network of their torture the weakest. The Seprona investigates who is behind the 'Killer knino' blog. Behind that pseudonym is a perpetrator of animals that has posted online the video sees as he kills a puppy. It is precisely those images which have unleashed a wave of indignation and condemnation in the network. The images are very hard.

' Elephant’ It is the name that identifies you in his blog and the network. In its digital blog, It displays images of torture until the death of a puppy. It burns, He treads and choking him while he whistles.

The author of these abuse claims this is the first of 95 dogs. Has left 94. According to, It is a vendetta against those who do not collect the droppings of their pets. The Seprona is trying to find the computer from which hung the torture video.

The ' elephant’ gives an address for anyone who wants to go to look for him in Badajoz, but it is not real. The case has mobilized even to the Group of ' Cyber’ Annonymous. They have analyzed the video and ask for help if someone recognizes the boots of the man or the door of your local. The Criminal Code establishes prison terms of three months to a year in jail for animal abuse. CGS

Source: http://www.Telecinco.es

 

Use of cookies

This web site uses cookies so that you have the best user experience. If you continue browsing you are giving your consent for the acceptance of the aforementioned cookies and the acceptance of our cookies policy, Click the link for more information.plugin cookies

TO ACCEPT
Notice of cookies